Arts Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
3: Refine and complete artistic work
Remove this criterion from the search
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Remove this criterion from the search
8: Interpret intent and meaning in artistic work
Remove this criterion from the search
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Results
Showing 281 - 290 of 333 Standards
Standard Identifier: Adv.TH:Pr6
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Theatre
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Theatre artists share and present stories, ideas, and envisioned worlds to explore the human experience in diverse cultures.
Essential Question(s): What happens when theatre artists and audiences share a creative experience?
Process Component(s): Share, Present
Performance Standard(s):
Present a drama/theatre production for a specific audience that employs research and analysis grounded in creative perspectives of the playwright, director, designer, and dramaturgy.
Essential Question(s): What happens when theatre artists and audiences share a creative experience?
Process Component(s): Share, Present
Performance Standard(s):
Present a drama/theatre production for a specific audience that employs research and analysis grounded in creative perspectives of the playwright, director, designer, and dramaturgy.
Standard Identifier: Prof.TH:Re8
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Theatre
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
8: Interpret intent and meaning in artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Theatre artists’ interpretations of drama/theatre work are influenced by personal experiences, culture, and aesthetics.
Essential Question(s): How can the same work of art communicate different messages to different people?
Process Component(s): Interpret
Performance Standard(s):
a. Analyze and compare artistic choices developed from personal experiences in multiple drama/theatre works. b. Identify and compare cultural contexts and contexts that may influence the evaluation of a drama/theatre work. c. Understand how multiple aesthetics, preferences, and beliefs shape participation in and observation of a drama/theatre work.
Essential Question(s): How can the same work of art communicate different messages to different people?
Process Component(s): Interpret
Performance Standard(s):
a. Analyze and compare artistic choices developed from personal experiences in multiple drama/theatre works. b. Identify and compare cultural contexts and contexts that may influence the evaluation of a drama/theatre work. c. Understand how multiple aesthetics, preferences, and beliefs shape participation in and observation of a drama/theatre work.
Standard Identifier: Acc.TH:Re8
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Theatre
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
8: Interpret intent and meaning in artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Theatre artists’ interpretations of drama/theatre work are influenced by personal experiences, culture, and aesthetics.
Essential Question(s): How can the same work of art communicate different messages to different people?
Process Component(s): Interpret
Performance Standard(s):
a. Develop detailed supporting evidence and criteria to reinforce artistic choices, when participating in or observing a drama/theatre work. b. Apply concepts from a drama/theatre work for personal realization about cultural contexts and understanding. c. Debate and distinguish multiple aesthetics, preferences, and beliefs through participation in and observation of drama/theatre work.
Essential Question(s): How can the same work of art communicate different messages to different people?
Process Component(s): Interpret
Performance Standard(s):
a. Develop detailed supporting evidence and criteria to reinforce artistic choices, when participating in or observing a drama/theatre work. b. Apply concepts from a drama/theatre work for personal realization about cultural contexts and understanding. c. Debate and distinguish multiple aesthetics, preferences, and beliefs through participation in and observation of drama/theatre work.
Standard Identifier: Adv.TH:Re8
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Theatre
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
8: Interpret intent and meaning in artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Theatre artists’ interpretations of drama/theatre work are influenced by personal experiences, culture, and aesthetics.
Essential Question(s): How can the same work of art communicate different messages to different people?
Process Component(s): Interpret
Performance Standard(s):
a. Use detailed supporting evidence and appropriate criteria to revise personal work and interpret the work of others when participating in or observing a drama/ theatre work. b. Use new understandings of cultures and contexts to shape personal responses to drama/theatre work. c. Support and explain aesthetics, preferences, and beliefs to create a context for critical research that informs artistic decisions in a drama/theatre work.
Essential Question(s): How can the same work of art communicate different messages to different people?
Process Component(s): Interpret
Performance Standard(s):
a. Use detailed supporting evidence and appropriate criteria to revise personal work and interpret the work of others when participating in or observing a drama/ theatre work. b. Use new understandings of cultures and contexts to shape personal responses to drama/theatre work. c. Support and explain aesthetics, preferences, and beliefs to create a context for critical research that informs artistic decisions in a drama/theatre work.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on personally- or collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis of the structure and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on personally- or collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis of the structure and context.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:C.Cr3.1
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Creating
Anchor Standard:
3: Refine and complete artistic work
Enduring Understanding: 3.1 Musicians evaluate, and refine their work through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their creative work?
Process Component(s): Evaluate and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Identify, describe, and apply teacher-provided criteria to assess and refine the technical and expressive aspects of evolving drafts leading to final versions.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their creative work?
Process Component(s): Evaluate and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Identify, describe, and apply teacher-provided criteria to assess and refine the technical and expressive aspects of evolving drafts leading to final versions.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:C.Cr3.1
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Creating
Anchor Standard:
3: Refine and complete artistic work
Enduring Understanding: 3.1 Musicians evaluate, and refine their work through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their creative work?
Process Component(s): Evaluate and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Identify, describe, and apply selected teacher-provided or personally-developed criteria to assess and refine the technical and expressive aspects of evolving drafts leading to final versions.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their creative work?
Process Component(s): Evaluate and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Identify, describe, and apply selected teacher-provided or personally-developed criteria to assess and refine the technical and expressive aspects of evolving drafts leading to final versions.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:C.Cr3.1
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Creating
Anchor Standard:
3: Refine and complete artistic work
Enduring Understanding: 3.1 Musicians evaluate, and refine their work through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their creative work?
Process Component(s): Evaluate and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Research, identify, explain, and apply personally-developed criteria to assess and refine the technical and expressive aspects of evolving drafts leading to final versions.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their creative work?
Process Component(s): Evaluate and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Research, identify, explain, and apply personally-developed criteria to assess and refine the technical and expressive aspects of evolving drafts leading to final versions.
Showing 281 - 290 of 333 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881