Arts Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
1: Generate and conceptualize artistic ideas and work
Remove this criterion from the search
4. Select, analyze, and interpret artistic work for presentation
Remove this criterion from the search
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Remove this criterion from the search
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Results
Showing 111 - 120 of 156 Standards
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:E.Cr1
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Creating
Anchor Standard:
1: Generate and conceptualize artistic ideas and work
Enduring Understanding: The creative ideas, concepts, and feelings that influence musicians’ work emerge from a variety of sources.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians generate creative ideas?
Process Component(s): Imagine
Performance Standard(s):
Compose and improvise musical ideas for a variety of purposes and contexts.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians generate creative ideas?
Process Component(s): Imagine
Performance Standard(s):
Compose and improvise musical ideas for a variety of purposes and contexts.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:H.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply teacher-provided and established criteria based on personal preference, analysis, and context (personal, social, and cultural) to evaluate individual and small group musical selections.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply teacher-provided and established criteria based on personal preference, analysis, and context (personal, social, and cultural) to evaluate individual and small group musical selections.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:H.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply personally-developed and established criteria based on research, personal preference, analysis, interpretation, expressive intent, and musical qualities to evaluate contrasting individual and small group musical selections.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply personally-developed and established criteria based on research, personal preference, analysis, interpretation, expressive intent, and musical qualities to evaluate contrasting individual and small group musical selections.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:H.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of a variety of individual and small group musical selections based on personally-developed and established criteria, personal decision making, and knowledge and understanding of context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of a variety of individual and small group musical selections based on personally-developed and established criteria, personal decision making, and knowledge and understanding of context.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:H.Pr5
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply criteria to critique individual and small group performances of a varied repertoire of music that includes melodies, improvisations, and chordal accompaniments in a variety of patterns, and create rehearsal strategies to address performance challenges and refine the performances.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply criteria to critique individual and small group performances of a varied repertoire of music that includes melodies, improvisations, and chordal accompaniments in a variety of patterns, and create rehearsal strategies to address performance challenges and refine the performances.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:H.Pr5
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply criteria to critique individual and small group performances of a varied repertoire of music that includes melodies, improvisations, and chordal accompaniments in a variety of styles, and create rehearsal strategies to address performance challenges and refine the performances.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply criteria to critique individual and small group performances of a varied repertoire of music that includes melodies, improvisations, and chordal accompaniments in a variety of styles, and create rehearsal strategies to address performance challenges and refine the performances.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:H.Pr5
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply criteria, including feedback from multiple sources, to critique varied programs of music repertoire selected for individual and small group performance, and create rehearsal strategies to address performance challenges and refine the performances.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply criteria, including feedback from multiple sources, to critique varied programs of music repertoire selected for individual and small group performance, and create rehearsal strategies to address performance challenges and refine the performances.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on personally- or collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis of the structure and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on personally- or collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis of the structure and context.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Showing 111 - 120 of 156 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881