Arts Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
1: Generate and conceptualize artistic ideas and work
Remove this criterion from the search
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Remove this criterion from the search
7: Perceive and analyze artistic work
Remove this criterion from the search
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Results
Showing 131 - 135 of 135 Standards
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:T.Re7.2
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
7: Perceive and analyze artistic work
Enduring Understanding: 7.2 Response to music is informed by analyzing context (social, cultural, and historical) and how creators and performers manipulate the elements of music.
Essential Question(s): How do individuals choose music to experience?
Process Component(s): Analyze
Performance Standard(s):
Explain how an analysis of the structure, context, and technological aspects of the music informs the response.
Essential Question(s): How do individuals choose music to experience?
Process Component(s): Analyze
Performance Standard(s):
Explain how an analysis of the structure, context, and technological aspects of the music informs the response.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:T.Re7.2
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
7: Perceive and analyze artistic work
Enduring Understanding: 7.2 Response to music is informed by analyzing context (social, cultural, and historical) and how creators and performers manipulate the elements of music.
Essential Question(s): How do individuals choose music to experience?
Process Component(s): Analyze
Performance Standard(s):
Demonstrate and justify how an analysis of the structural characteristics, context, and technological and creative decisions, informs interest in and response to the music.
Essential Question(s): How do individuals choose music to experience?
Process Component(s): Analyze
Performance Standard(s):
Demonstrate and justify how an analysis of the structural characteristics, context, and technological and creative decisions, informs interest in and response to the music.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:T.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate music using teacher-provided criteria based on analysis, interpretation, digital and electronic features, and personal interests.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate music using teacher-provided criteria based on analysis, interpretation, digital and electronic features, and personal interests.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:T.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply teacher-provided or personally-developed criteria to evaluate music based on analysis, interpretation, artistic intent, digital, electronic, and analog features, and musical qualities.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply teacher-provided or personally-developed criteria to evaluate music based on analysis, interpretation, artistic intent, digital, electronic, and analog features, and musical qualities.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:T.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify the evaluation of a variety of music based on established and personally-developed criteria, digital, electronic and analog features, and understanding of purpose and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify the evaluation of a variety of music based on established and personally-developed criteria, digital, electronic and analog features, and understanding of purpose and context.
Showing 131 - 135 of 135 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881