Arts Standards
Results
Showing 1 - 6 of 6 Standards
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:T.Pr6
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Musicians judge performance based on criteria that vary across time, place, and cultures. The context and how a work is presented influence audience response.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Using digital tools, demonstrate attention to technical accuracy and expressive qualities in prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire of music b. Demonstrate an understanding of the context of music through prepared and improvised performances.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Using digital tools, demonstrate attention to technical accuracy and expressive qualities in prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire of music b. Demonstrate an understanding of the context of music through prepared and improvised performances.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:T.Pr6
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Musicians judge performance based on criteria that vary across time, place, and cultures. The context and how a work is presented influence audience response.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Using digital tools and resources, demonstrate technical accuracy and expressive qualities in prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire of music representing diverse cultures, styles, and genres. b. Demonstrate an understanding of the expressive intent when connecting with an audience through prepared and improvised performances.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Using digital tools and resources, demonstrate technical accuracy and expressive qualities in prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire of music representing diverse cultures, styles, and genres. b. Demonstrate an understanding of the expressive intent when connecting with an audience through prepared and improvised performances.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:T.Pr6
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Musicians judge performance based on criteria that vary across time, place, and cultures. The context and how a work is presented influence audience response.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Integrating digital and analog tools and resources, demonstrate an understanding and attention to technical accuracy and expressive qualities of the music in prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire of music representing diverse cultures, styles, genres, and historical periods. b. Demonstrate an ability to connect with audience members before, and engaging with and responding to them during prepared and improvised performances.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Integrating digital and analog tools and resources, demonstrate an understanding and attention to technical accuracy and expressive qualities of the music in prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire of music representing diverse cultures, styles, genres, and historical periods. b. Demonstrate an ability to connect with audience members before, and engaging with and responding to them during prepared and improvised performances.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:T.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate music using teacher-provided criteria based on analysis, interpretation, digital and electronic features, and personal interests.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate music using teacher-provided criteria based on analysis, interpretation, digital and electronic features, and personal interests.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:T.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply teacher-provided or personally-developed criteria to evaluate music based on analysis, interpretation, artistic intent, digital, electronic, and analog features, and musical qualities.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply teacher-provided or personally-developed criteria to evaluate music based on analysis, interpretation, artistic intent, digital, electronic, and analog features, and musical qualities.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:T.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Technology
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify the evaluation of a variety of music based on established and personally-developed criteria, digital, electronic and analog features, and understanding of purpose and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify the evaluation of a variety of music based on established and personally-developed criteria, digital, electronic and analog features, and understanding of purpose and context.
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881