English Language Development Standards
Results
Showing 21 - 30 of 63 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.11a.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing relevant textual evidence (e.g., quoting from the text or referring to what the text says) or relevant background knowledge, with moderate support.
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing relevant textual evidence (e.g., quoting from the text or referring to what the text says) or relevant background knowledge, with moderate support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.11b.Br
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., probably/certainly/definitely, should/would, might) and phrasing (e.g., In my opinion. . . ).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., probably/certainly/definitely, should/would, might) and phrasing (e.g., In my opinion. . . ).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.11b.Em
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with some basic modal expressions (e.g., can, has to).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with some basic modal expressions (e.g., can, has to).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.11b.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., maybe/probably, can/could, must).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., maybe/probably, can/could, must).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.7.Br
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language resources to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the specific language used to present ideas and claims that are well supported and distinguishing them from those that are not) with light support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language resources to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the specific language used to present ideas and claims that are well supported and distinguishing them from those that are not) with light support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.7.Em
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use language to support ideas and arguments with detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the precise vocabulary used to present evidence, or the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning) with substantial support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use language to support ideas and arguments with detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the precise vocabulary used to present evidence, or the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning) with substantial support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.7.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., showing the clarity of the phrasing used to present an argument) with moderate support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., showing the clarity of the phrasing used to present an argument) with moderate support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.11a.Br
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing detailed and relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with light support.
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing detailed and relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with light support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.11a.Em
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions by providing some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with substantial support.
Justify opinions by providing some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with substantial support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.11a.Ex
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with moderate support.
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with moderate support.
Showing 21 - 30 of 63 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881