English Language Development Standards
Results
Showing 41 - 50 of 63 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would.)
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would.)
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.7.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language resources to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the specific language used to present ideas and claims that are well supported and distinguishing them from those that are not) when provided with light support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language resources to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the specific language used to present ideas and claims that are well supported and distinguishing them from those that are not) when provided with light support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.7.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use language to support ideas and arguments with detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the precise vocabulary used to present evidence, or the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning) when provided with substantial support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use language to support ideas and arguments with detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the precise vocabulary used to present evidence, or the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning) when provided with substantial support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.7.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., showing the clarity of the phrasing used to present an argument) when provided with moderate support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., showing the clarity of the phrasing used to present an argument) when provided with moderate support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11a.Br
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions or persuade others by making connections and distinctions between ideas and texts and articulating sufficient, detailed, and relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, using appropriate register.
Justify opinions or persuade others by making connections and distinctions between ideas and texts and articulating sufficient, detailed, and relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, using appropriate register.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11a.Em
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions by articulating some relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, with visual support.
Justify opinions by articulating some relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, with visual support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11a.Ex
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions and positions or persuade others by making connections between ideas and articulating relevant textual evidence or background knowledge.
Justify opinions and positions or persuade others by making connections between ideas and articulating relevant textual evidence or background knowledge.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11b.Br
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., possibly/ potentially/ certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., possibly/ potentially/ certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11b.Em
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Showing 41 - 50 of 63 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881