English Language Development Standards
Results
Showing 21 - 30 of 129 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.1.7.Ex
Grade:
1
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Describe the language writers or speakers use to present or support an idea (e.g., the adjectives used to describe people and places), with prompting and moderate support.
Describe the language writers or speakers use to present or support an idea (e.g., the adjectives used to describe people and places), with prompting and moderate support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12a.Br
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Retell texts and recount experiences using increasingly detailed complete sentences and key words.
Retell texts and recount experiences using increasingly detailed complete sentences and key words.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12a.Em
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Retell texts and recount experiences by using key words.
Retell texts and recount experiences by using key words.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12a.Ex
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Retell texts and recount experiences using complete sentences and key words.
Retell texts and recount experiences using complete sentences and key words.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12b.Br
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Use a wide variety of general academic and domain-specific words, synonyms, antonyms, and non-literal language (e.g., He was as quick as a cricket) to create an effect, precision, and shades of meaning while speaking and writing.
Use a wide variety of general academic and domain-specific words, synonyms, antonyms, and non-literal language (e.g., He was as quick as a cricket) to create an effect, precision, and shades of meaning while speaking and writing.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12b.Em
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Use a select number of general academic and domain-specific words to add detail (e.g., adding the word generous to describe a character, using the word lava to explain volcanic eruptions) while speaking and writing.
Use a select number of general academic and domain-specific words to add detail (e.g., adding the word generous to describe a character, using the word lava to explain volcanic eruptions) while speaking and writing.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12b.Ex
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Use a growing number of general academic and domain-specific words in order to add detail, create an effect (e.g., using the word suddenly to signal a change), or create shades of meaning (e.g., scurry versus dash) while speaking and writing.
Use a growing number of general academic and domain-specific words in order to add detail, create an effect (e.g., using the word suddenly to signal a change), or create shades of meaning (e.g., scurry versus dash) while speaking and writing.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.7.Br
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Describe how well writers or speakers use specific language resources to support an opinion or present an idea (e.g., whether the vocabulary used to present evidence is strong enough), with light support.
Describe how well writers or speakers use specific language resources to support an opinion or present an idea (e.g., whether the vocabulary used to present evidence is strong enough), with light support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.7.Em
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Describe the language writers or speakers use to present an idea (e.g., the words and phrases used to describe a character), with prompting and substantial support.
Describe the language writers or speakers use to present an idea (e.g., the words and phrases used to describe a character), with prompting and substantial support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.7.Ex
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Describe the language writers or speakers use to present or support an idea (e.g., the author’s choice of vocabulary or phrasing to portray characters, places, or real people), with prompting and moderate support.
Describe the language writers or speakers use to present or support an idea (e.g., the author’s choice of vocabulary or phrasing to portray characters, places, or real people), with prompting and moderate support.
Showing 21 - 30 of 129 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881