English Language Development Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
Add a Content Strand
Remove this criterion from the search
Analyzing language choices
Remove this criterion from the search
Exchanging information and ideas
Remove this criterion from the search
Justifying/arguing
Remove this criterion from the search
Selecting language resources
Remove this criterion from the search
Supporting opinions
Results
Showing 41 - 50 of 162 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12b.Em
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Use a select number of general academic and domain-specific words to add detail (e.g., adding the word generous to describe a character, using the word lava to explain volcanic eruptions) while speaking and writing.
Use a select number of general academic and domain-specific words to add detail (e.g., adding the word generous to describe a character, using the word lava to explain volcanic eruptions) while speaking and writing.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.12b.Ex
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Selecting language resources
Standard:
Use a growing number of general academic and domain-specific words in order to add detail, create an effect (e.g., using the word suddenly to signal a change), or create shades of meaning (e.g., scurry versus dash) while speaking and writing.
Use a growing number of general academic and domain-specific words in order to add detail, create an effect (e.g., using the word suddenly to signal a change), or create shades of meaning (e.g., scurry versus dash) while speaking and writing.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.8.Br
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Distinguish how multiple different words with similar meaning (e.g., pleased versus happy versus ecstatic, heard or knew versus believed) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Distinguish how multiple different words with similar meaning (e.g., pleased versus happy versus ecstatic, heard or knew versus believed) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.8.Em
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Distinguish how two different frequently used words (e.g., describing a character as happy versus angry) produce a different effect on the audience.
Distinguish how two different frequently used words (e.g., describing a character as happy versus angry) produce a different effect on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.2.8.Ex
Grade:
2
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Distinguish how two different words with similar meaning (e.g., describing a character as happy versus ecstatic) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Distinguish how two different words with similar meaning (e.g., describing a character as happy versus ecstatic) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.3.1.Br
Grade:
3
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Exchanging information and ideas
Standard:
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, adding relevant information, building on responses, and providing useful feedback.
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, adding relevant information, building on responses, and providing useful feedback.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.3.1.Em
Grade:
3
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Exchanging information and ideas
Standard:
Contribute to conversations and express ideas by asking and answering yes-no and wh- questions and responding using short phrases.
Contribute to conversations and express ideas by asking and answering yes-no and wh- questions and responding using short phrases.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.3.1.Ex
Grade:
3
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Exchanging information and ideas
Standard:
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, and adding relevant information.
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, and adding relevant information.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.3.11.Br
Grade:
3
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Supporting opinions
Standard:
Support opinions or persuade others by providing good reasons and detailed textual evidence (e.g., specific events or graphics from text) or relevant background knowledge about the content.
Support opinions or persuade others by providing good reasons and detailed textual evidence (e.g., specific events or graphics from text) or relevant background knowledge about the content.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.3.11.Em
Grade:
3
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Supporting opinions
Standard:
Support opinions by providing good reasons and some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge (e.g., referring to textual evidence or knowledge of content).
Support opinions by providing good reasons and some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge (e.g., referring to textual evidence or knowledge of content).
Showing 41 - 50 of 162 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881