English Language Development Standards
Results
Showing 81 - 90 of 105 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PII.8.3.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part II: Learning About How English Works
Cluster:
B. Expanding and Enriching Ideas
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Using verbs and verb phrases
Standard:
Use a variety of verbs in different tenses (e.g., past, present, future, simple, progressive, perfect) appropriate to the task, text type, and discipline (e.g., the present perfect to describe previously made claims or conclusions) on an increasing variety of topics.
Use a variety of verbs in different tenses (e.g., past, present, future, simple, progressive, perfect) appropriate to the task, text type, and discipline (e.g., the present perfect to describe previously made claims or conclusions) on an increasing variety of topics.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11a.Br
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions or persuade others by making connections and distinctions between ideas and texts and articulating sufficient, detailed, and relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, using appropriate register.
Justify opinions or persuade others by making connections and distinctions between ideas and texts and articulating sufficient, detailed, and relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, using appropriate register.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11a.Em
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions by articulating some relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, with visual support.
Justify opinions by articulating some relevant textual evidence or background knowledge, with visual support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11a.Ex
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions and positions or persuade others by making connections between ideas and articulating relevant textual evidence or background knowledge.
Justify opinions and positions or persuade others by making connections between ideas and articulating relevant textual evidence or background knowledge.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11b.Br
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., possibly/ potentially/ certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., possibly/ potentially/ certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11b.Em
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.11b.Ex
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.8.Br
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how a writer’s or speaker’s choice of a variety of different types of phrasing or words (e.g., hyperbole, varying connotations, the cumulative impact of word choices) produces nuances and different effects on the audience.
Explain how a writer’s or speaker’s choice of a variety of different types of phrasing or words (e.g., hyperbole, varying connotations, the cumulative impact of word choices) produces nuances and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.8.Em
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how a writer’s or speaker’s choice of phrasing or specific words (e.g., describing a character or action as aggressive versus bold) produces nuances and different effects on the audience.
Explain how a writer’s or speaker’s choice of phrasing or specific words (e.g., describing a character or action as aggressive versus bold) produces nuances and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.9–10.8.Ex
Grade Range:
9–10
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how a writer’s or speaker’s choice of phrasing or specific words (e.g., using figurative language or words with multiple meanings to describe an event or character) produces nuances and different effects on the audience.
Explain how a writer’s or speaker’s choice of phrasing or specific words (e.g., using figurative language or words with multiple meanings to describe an event or character) produces nuances and different effects on the audience.
Showing 81 - 90 of 105 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881