English Language Development Standards
Results
Showing 171 - 180 of 183 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.11a.Ex
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions and positions or persuade others by making connections between ideas and articulating relevant textual evidence or background knowledge.
Justify opinions and positions or persuade others by making connections between ideas and articulating relevant textual evidence or background knowledge.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.11b.Br
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., possibly/potentially/certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., possibly/potentially/certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.11b.Em
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.11b.Ex
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.2.Br
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Collaborate with peers to engage in a variety of extended written exchanges and complex grade-appropriate writing projects, using technology as appropriate.
Collaborate with peers to engage in a variety of extended written exchanges and complex grade-appropriate writing projects, using technology as appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.2.Em
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Collaborate with peers to engage in short, grade-appropriate written exchanges and writing projects, using technology as appropriate.
Collaborate with peers to engage in short, grade-appropriate written exchanges and writing projects, using technology as appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.2.Ex
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Collaborate with peers to engage in increasingly complex grade-appropriate written exchanges and writing projects, using technology as appropriate.
Collaborate with peers to engage in increasingly complex grade-appropriate written exchanges and writing projects, using technology as appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.4.Br
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Adapting language choices
Standard:
Adjust language choices according to the task (e.g., group presentation of research project), context (e.g., classroom, community), purpose (e.g., to persuade, to provide arguments or counterarguments), and audience (e.g., peers, teachers, college recruiter).
Adjust language choices according to the task (e.g., group presentation of research project), context (e.g., classroom, community), purpose (e.g., to persuade, to provide arguments or counterarguments), and audience (e.g., peers, teachers, college recruiter).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.4.Em
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Adapting language choices
Standard:
Adjust language choices according to the to the context (e.g., classroom, community) and audience (e.g., peers, teachers).
Adjust language choices according to the to the context (e.g., classroom, community) and audience (e.g., peers, teachers).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.11–12.4.Ex
Grade Range:
11–12
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Adapting language choices
Standard:
Adjust language choices according to the context (e.g., classroom, community), purpose (e.g., to persuade, to provide arguments or counterarguments), task, and audience (e.g., peers, teachers, guest lecturer).
Adjust language choices according to the context (e.g., classroom, community), purpose (e.g., to persuade, to provide arguments or counterarguments), task, and audience (e.g., peers, teachers, guest lecturer).
Showing 171 - 180 of 183 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881