English Language Development Standards
Results
Showing 131 - 140 of 186 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11a.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions by providing some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with substantial support.
Justify opinions by providing some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with substantial support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11a.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with moderate support.
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with moderate support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., potentially/certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., potentially/certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would.)
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would.)
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.8.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., cunning versus smart, stammer versus say) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., cunning versus smart, stammer versus say) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.8.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meanings (e.g., choosing to use the word persistent versus the term hard worker) produce different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meanings (e.g., choosing to use the word persistent versus the term hard worker) produce different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.8.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., describing a character as stubborn versus persistent) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., describing a character as stubborn versus persistent) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PII.8.2a.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part II: Learning About How English Works
Cluster:
A. Structuring Cohesive Texts
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Understanding cohesion
Standard:
Apply knowledge of familiar language resources for referring to make texts more cohesive (e.g., how pronouns, synonyms, or nominalizations are used to refer backward in a text) to comprehending texts and writing cohesive texts.
Apply knowledge of familiar language resources for referring to make texts more cohesive (e.g., how pronouns, synonyms, or nominalizations are used to refer backward in a text) to comprehending texts and writing cohesive texts.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PII.8.2a.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part II: Learning About How English Works
Cluster:
A. Structuring Cohesive Texts
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Understanding cohesion
Standard:
Apply knowledge of familiar language resources for referring to make texts more cohesive (e.g., how pronouns refer back to nouns in text) to comprehending and writing brief texts.
Apply knowledge of familiar language resources for referring to make texts more cohesive (e.g., how pronouns refer back to nouns in text) to comprehending and writing brief texts.
Showing 131 - 140 of 186 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881