English Language Development Standards
Results
Showing 31 - 40 of 117 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.4.8.Br
Grade:
4
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Analyzing language choices Distinguish how different words with related meanings (e.g., fun versus entertaining versus thrilling, possibly versus certainly) and figurative language produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Analyzing language choices Distinguish how different words with related meanings (e.g., fun versus entertaining versus thrilling, possibly versus certainly) and figurative language produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.4.8.Em
Grade:
4
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Distinguish how different words with similar meanings produce different effects on the audience (e.g., describing a character's actions as whined versus said).
Distinguish how different words with similar meanings produce different effects on the audience (e.g., describing a character's actions as whined versus said).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.4.8.Ex
Grade:
4
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Distinguish how different words with similar meanings (e.g., describing a character as smart versus an expert) and figurative language (e.g., as big as a whale) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Distinguish how different words with similar meanings (e.g., describing a character as smart versus an expert) and figurative language (e.g., as big as a whale) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.5.1.Br
Grade:
5
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Exchanging information/ideas
Standard:
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, and adding relevant information, building on responses, and providing useful feedback.
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, and adding relevant information, building on responses, and providing useful feedback.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.5.1.Em
Grade:
5
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Exchanging information/ideas
Standard:
Contribute to conversations and express ideas by asking and answering yes-no and wh- questions and responding using short phrases.
Contribute to conversations and express ideas by asking and answering yes-no and wh- questions and responding using short phrases.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.5.1.Ex
Grade:
5
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Exchanging information/ideas
Standard:
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, and adding relevant information.
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions, including sustained dialogue, by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, and adding relevant information.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.5.7.Br
Grade:
5
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language resources to support an opinion or present an idea (e.g., the clarity or appealing nature of language used to provide evidence or describe characters, or if the phrasing used to introduce a topic is appropriate), with light support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language resources to support an opinion or present an idea (e.g., the clarity or appealing nature of language used to provide evidence or describe characters, or if the phrasing used to introduce a topic is appropriate), with light support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.5.7.Em
Grade:
5
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Describe the specific language writers or speakers use to present or support an idea (e.g., the specific vocabulary or phrasing used to provide evidence), with prompting and substantial support.
Describe the specific language writers or speakers use to present or support an idea (e.g., the specific vocabulary or phrasing used to provide evidence), with prompting and substantial support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.5.7.Ex
Grade:
5
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use language resources to support an opinion or present an idea (e.g., whether the vocabulary used to provide evidence is strong enough, or if the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning does this well), with moderate support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use language resources to support an opinion or present an idea (e.g., whether the vocabulary used to provide evidence is strong enough, or if the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning does this well), with moderate support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.5.8.Br
Grade:
5
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Distinguish how different words with related meanings (e.g., fun versus thrilling, possibly versus certainly) and figurative language (e.g., the stream slithered through the parched land) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Distinguish how different words with related meanings (e.g., fun versus thrilling, possibly versus certainly) and figurative language (e.g., the stream slithered through the parched land) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Showing 31 - 40 of 117 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881