Arts Standards
Results
Showing 51 - 60 of 78 Standards
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:E.Pr6
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Musicians judge performance based on criteria that vary across time, place, and cultures. The context and how a work is presented influence audience response.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Demonstrate an understanding and mastery of the technical demands and expressive qualities of the music through prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire representing diverse cultures, styles, genres, and historical periods in multiple types of ensembles. b. Demonstrate an ability to connect with audience members before and during the process of engaging with and responding to them through prepared and improvised performances.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Demonstrate an understanding and mastery of the technical demands and expressive qualities of the music through prepared and improvised performances of a varied repertoire representing diverse cultures, styles, genres, and historical periods in multiple types of ensembles. b. Demonstrate an ability to connect with audience members before and during the process of engaging with and responding to them through prepared and improvised performances.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:E.Pr5
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop strategies to address expressive challenges in a varied repertoire of music, and evaluate their success using feedback from ensemble peers and other sources to refine performances.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop strategies to address expressive challenges in a varied repertoire of music, and evaluate their success using feedback from ensemble peers and other sources to refine performances.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:E.Pr5
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply appropriate rehearsal strategies to address individual and ensemble challenges in a varied repertoire of music, and evaluate their success.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply appropriate rehearsal strategies to address individual and ensemble challenges in a varied repertoire of music, and evaluate their success.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:E.Pr5
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop, apply, and refine appropriate rehearsal strategies to address individual and ensemble challenges in a varied repertoire of music.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
Develop, apply, and refine appropriate rehearsal strategies to address individual and ensemble challenges in a varied repertoire of music.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:H.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply teacher-provided and established criteria based on personal preference, analysis, and context (personal, social, and cultural) to evaluate individual and small group musical selections.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and apply teacher-provided and established criteria based on personal preference, analysis, and context (personal, social, and cultural) to evaluate individual and small group musical selections.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:H.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply personally-developed and established criteria based on research, personal preference, analysis, interpretation, expressive intent, and musical qualities to evaluate contrasting individual and small group musical selections.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Apply personally-developed and established criteria based on research, personal preference, analysis, interpretation, expressive intent, and musical qualities to evaluate contrasting individual and small group musical selections.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:H.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Harmonizing Instruments
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of a variety of individual and small group musical selections based on personally-developed and established criteria, personal decision making, and knowledge and understanding of context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of a variety of individual and small group musical selections based on personally-developed and established criteria, personal decision making, and knowledge and understanding of context.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on personally- or collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis of the structure and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on personally- or collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis of the structure and context.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Showing 51 - 60 of 78 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881