Arts Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
2: Organize and develop artistic ideas and work
Remove this criterion from the search
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Remove this criterion from the search
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Remove this criterion from the search
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Results
Showing 151 - 160 of 182 Standards
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Evaluate works and performances based on research as well as personally- and collaboratively-developed criteria, including analysis and interpretation of the structure and context.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:E.Re9
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Ensembles
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
Develop and justify evaluations of music, programs of music, and performances based on criteria, personal decision-making, research, and understanding of contexts.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:C.Pr5
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
a. Create rehearsal plans for works, identifying repetition and variation within the form. b. Using established criteria and feedback, identify the way(s) in which performances convey the elements of music, style, and mood. c. Identify and implement strategies for improving the technical and expressive aspects of multiple works.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
a. Create rehearsal plans for works, identifying repetition and variation within the form. b. Using established criteria and feedback, identify the way(s) in which performances convey the elements of music, style, and mood. c. Identify and implement strategies for improving the technical and expressive aspects of multiple works.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:C.Pr5
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
a. Create rehearsal plans for works, identifying the form, repetition and variation within the form, and the style and historical or cultural context of the work. b. Using established criteria and feedback, identify the ways in which performances convey the formal design, style, and historical/cultural context of the works. c. Identify and implement strategies for improving the technical and expressive aspects of varied works.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
a. Create rehearsal plans for works, identifying the form, repetition and variation within the form, and the style and historical or cultural context of the work. b. Using established criteria and feedback, identify the ways in which performances convey the formal design, style, and historical/cultural context of the works. c. Identify and implement strategies for improving the technical and expressive aspects of varied works.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:C.Pr5
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
5: Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation
Enduring Understanding: To express their musical ideas, musicians analyze, evaluate, and refine their performance over time through openness to new ideas, persistence, and the application of appropriate criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
a. Create rehearsal plans for works, identifying the form, repetition and variation within the form, compositional techniques, and the style and historical or cultural context of the work. b. Using established criteria and feedback, identify the ways in which performances use compositional techniques and convey the formal design, style, and historical/cultural context of the works. c. Identify, compare, and implement strategies for improving the technical and expressive aspects of multiple contrasting works.
Essential Question(s): How do musicians improve the quality of their performance?
Process Component(s): Rehearse, Evaluate, and Refine
Performance Standard(s):
a. Create rehearsal plans for works, identifying the form, repetition and variation within the form, compositional techniques, and the style and historical or cultural context of the work. b. Using established criteria and feedback, identify the ways in which performances use compositional techniques and convey the formal design, style, and historical/cultural context of the works. c. Identify, compare, and implement strategies for improving the technical and expressive aspects of multiple contrasting works.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:C.Pr6
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Musicians judge performance based on criteria that vary across time, place, and cultures. The context and how a work is presented influence audience response.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Share live or recorded performances of works (both personal and others’) and explain how the elements of music are used to convey intent. b. Identify how compositions are appropriate for an audience or context, and how this will shape future compositions.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Share live or recorded performances of works (both personal and others’) and explain how the elements of music are used to convey intent. b. Identify how compositions are appropriate for an audience or context, and how this will shape future compositions.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:C.Pr6
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Musicians judge performance based on criteria that vary across time, place, and cultures. The context and how a work is presented influence audience response.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Share live or recorded performances of works (both personal and others’), and explain how the elements of music and compositional techniques are used to convey intent. b. Explain how compositions are appropriate for both audience and context, and how this will shape future compositions.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Share live or recorded performances of works (both personal and others’), and explain how the elements of music and compositional techniques are used to convey intent. b. Explain how compositions are appropriate for both audience and context, and how this will shape future compositions.
Standard Identifier: Adv.MU:C.Pr6
Grade Range:
Advanced
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Performing
Anchor Standard:
6: Convey meaning through the presentation of artistic work
Enduring Understanding: Musicians judge performance based on criteria that vary across time, place, and cultures. The context and how a work is presented influence audience response.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Share live or recorded performances of works (both personal and others’), and explain and/or demonstrate understanding of how the expressive intent of the music is conveyed. b. Explain how compositions are appropriate for a variety of audiences and contexts, and how this will shape future compositions.
Essential Question(s): When is a performance judged ready to present? How do context and the manner in which musical work is presented influence audience response?
Process Component(s): Present
Performance Standard(s):
a. Share live or recorded performances of works (both personal and others’), and explain and/or demonstrate understanding of how the expressive intent of the music is conveyed. b. Explain how compositions are appropriate for a variety of audiences and contexts, and how this will shape future compositions.
Standard Identifier: Prof.MU:C.Re9
Grade Range:
Proficient
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
a. Describe the effectiveness of the technical and expressive aspects of selected music and performances, demonstrating understanding of fundamentals of music theory. b. Describe the way(s) in which critiquing others’ work and receiving feedback from others can be applied in the personal creative process.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
a. Describe the effectiveness of the technical and expressive aspects of selected music and performances, demonstrating understanding of fundamentals of music theory. b. Describe the way(s) in which critiquing others’ work and receiving feedback from others can be applied in the personal creative process.
Standard Identifier: Acc.MU:C.Re9
Grade Range:
Accomplished
Discipline:
Music
Subdiscipline:
Composition and Theory
Artistic Process:
Responding
Anchor Standard:
9: Apply criteria to evaluate artistic work
Enduring Understanding: The personal evaluation of musical work(s) and performance(s) is informed by analysis, interpretation, and established criteria.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
a. Explain the effectiveness of the technical and expressive aspects of selected music and performances, demonstrating understanding of music theory as well as compositional techniques and procedures. b. Describe ways in which critiquing others’ work and receiving feedback from others have been specifically applied in the personal creative process.
Essential Question(s): How do we judge the quality of musical work(s) and performance(s)?
Process Component(s): Evaluate
Performance Standard(s):
a. Explain the effectiveness of the technical and expressive aspects of selected music and performances, demonstrating understanding of music theory as well as compositional techniques and procedures. b. Describe ways in which critiquing others’ work and receiving feedback from others have been specifically applied in the personal creative process.
Showing 151 - 160 of 182 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881