English Language Development Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
Analyzing language choices
Remove this criterion from the search
Evaluating language choices
Remove this criterion from the search
Exchanging information/ideas
Remove this criterion from the search
Justifying/arguing
Remove this criterion from the search
Offering opinions
Results
Showing 71 - 80 of 135 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.7.Em
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use language to support ideas and arguments with detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the precise vocabulary used to present evidence, or the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning) with substantial support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use language to support ideas and arguments with detailed evidence (e.g., identifying the precise vocabulary used to present evidence, or the phrasing used to signal a shift in meaning) with substantial support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.7.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Evaluating language choices
Standard:
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., showing the clarity of the phrasing used to present an argument) with moderate support.
Explain how well writers and speakers use specific language to present ideas or support arguments and provide detailed evidence (e.g., showing the clarity of the phrasing used to present an argument) with moderate support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.8.Br
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., stingy, economical, frugal, thrifty), or figurative language (e.g., The room was depressed and gloomy. The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., stingy, economical, frugal, thrifty), or figurative language (e.g., The room was depressed and gloomy. The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.8.Em
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meaning (e.g., choosing to use the word cheap versus the phrase a good saver) produce different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meaning (e.g., choosing to use the word cheap versus the phrase a good saver) produce different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.8.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., describing a character as stingy versus economical), or figurative language (e.g., The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., describing a character as stingy versus economical), or figurative language (e.g., The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.1.Br
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Exchanging information/ideas
Standard:
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, adding relevant information and evidence, paraphrasing key ideas, building on responses, and providing useful feedback.
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, adding relevant information and evidence, paraphrasing key ideas, building on responses, and providing useful feedback.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.1.Em
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Exchanging information/ideas
Standard:
Engage in conversational exchanges and express ideas on familiar topics by asking and answering yes-no and wh- questions and responding using simple phrases.
Engage in conversational exchanges and express ideas on familiar topics by asking and answering yes-no and wh- questions and responding using simple phrases.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.1.Ex
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Exchanging information/ideas
Standard:
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, adding relevant information, and paraphrasing key ideas.
Contribute to class, group, and partner discussions by following turn-taking rules, asking relevant questions, affirming others, adding relevant information, and paraphrasing key ideas.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.11a.Br
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing detailed and relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with light support.
Justify opinions or persuade others by providing detailed and relevant textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with light support.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.7.11a.Em
Grade:
7
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Justify opinions by providing some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with substantial support.
Justify opinions by providing some textual evidence or relevant background knowledge, with substantial support.
Showing 71 - 80 of 135 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881