English Language Development Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
Analyzing language choices
Remove this criterion from the search
Composing/Writing
Remove this criterion from the search
Connecting ideas
Remove this criterion from the search
Interacting via written English
Remove this criterion from the search
Justifying/arguing
Results
Showing 61 - 70 of 132 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.11b.Br
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., probably/certainly/definitely, should/would, might) and phrasing (e.g., In my opinion. . . ).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., probably/certainly/definitely, should/would, might) and phrasing (e.g., In my opinion. . . ).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.11b.Em
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with some basic modal expressions (e.g., can, has to).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with some basic modal expressions (e.g., can, has to).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.11b.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., maybe/probably, can/could, must).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., maybe/probably, can/could, must).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.2.Br
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Engage in extended written exchanges with peers and collaborate on complex written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Engage in extended written exchanges with peers and collaborate on complex written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.2.Em
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Engage in short written exchanges with peers and collaborate on simple written texts on familiar topics, using technology when appropriate.
Engage in short written exchanges with peers and collaborate on simple written texts on familiar topics, using technology when appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.2.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Engage in long written exchanges with peers and collaborate on more detailed written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Engage in long written exchanges with peers and collaborate on more detailed written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.8.Br
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., stingy, economical, frugal, thrifty), or figurative language (e.g., The room was depressed and gloomy. The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., stingy, economical, frugal, thrifty), or figurative language (e.g., The room was depressed and gloomy. The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.8.Em
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meaning (e.g., choosing to use the word cheap versus the phrase a good saver) produce different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meaning (e.g., choosing to use the word cheap versus the phrase a good saver) produce different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.6.8.Ex
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., describing a character as stingy versus economical), or figurative language (e.g., The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing, different words with similar meaning (e.g., describing a character as stingy versus economical), or figurative language (e.g., The room was like a dank cave, littered with food wrappers, soda cans, and piles of laundry) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PII.6.6.Br
Grade:
6
Critical Principle:
Part II: Learning About How English Works
Cluster:
C. Connecting and Condensing Ideas
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Connecting ideas
Standard:
Combine clauses in a wide variety of ways (e.g., creating compound and complex sentences) to make connections between and join ideas, for example, to express a reason (e.g., He stayed at home on Sunday because he had an exam on Monday), to make a concession (e.g., She studied all night even though she wasn’t feeling well), or to link two ideas that happen at the same time (e.g., The students worked in groups while their teacher walked around the room).
Combine clauses in a wide variety of ways (e.g., creating compound and complex sentences) to make connections between and join ideas, for example, to express a reason (e.g., He stayed at home on Sunday because he had an exam on Monday), to make a concession (e.g., She studied all night even though she wasn’t feeling well), or to link two ideas that happen at the same time (e.g., The students worked in groups while their teacher walked around the room).
Showing 61 - 70 of 132 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881