English Language Development Standards
Remove this criterion from the search
Analyzing language choices
Remove this criterion from the search
Composing/Writing
Remove this criterion from the search
Connecting ideas
Remove this criterion from the search
Interacting via written English
Remove this criterion from the search
Justifying/arguing
Results
Showing 91 - 100 of 132 Standards
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., potentially/certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with nuanced modal expressions (e.g., potentially/certainly/absolutely, should/might).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with familiar modal expressions (e.g., can, may).
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.11b.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
C. Productive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Justifying/arguing
Standard:
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would.)
Express attitude and opinions or temper statements with a variety of familiar modal expressions (e.g., possibly/likely, could/would.)
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.2.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Engage in extended written exchanges with peers and collaborate on complex written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Engage in extended written exchanges with peers and collaborate on complex written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.2.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Engage in short written exchanges with peers and collaborate on simple written texts on familiar topics, using technology when appropriate.
Engage in short written exchanges with peers and collaborate on simple written texts on familiar topics, using technology when appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.2.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
A. Collaborative
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Interacting via written English
Standard:
Engage in longer written exchanges with peers and collaborate on more detailed written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Engage in longer written exchanges with peers and collaborate on more detailed written texts on a variety of topics, using technology when appropriate.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.8.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., cunning versus smart, stammer versus say) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., cunning versus smart, stammer versus say) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning, nuances, and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.8.Em
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Emerging
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meanings (e.g., choosing to use the word persistent versus the term hard worker) produce different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different common words with similar meanings (e.g., choosing to use the word persistent versus the term hard worker) produce different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PI.8.8.Ex
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part I: Interacting in Meaningful Ways
Cluster:
B. Interpretive
Proficiency Level:
Expanding
Content Strand:
Analyzing language choices
Standard:
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., describing a character as stubborn versus persistent) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Explain how phrasing or different words with similar meanings (e.g., describing a character as stubborn versus persistent) or figurative language (e.g., Let me throw some light onto the topic) produce shades of meaning and different effects on the audience.
Standard Identifier: ELD.PII.8.6.Br
Grade:
8
Critical Principle:
Part II: Learning About How English Works
Cluster:
C. Connecting and Condensing Ideas
Proficiency Level:
Bridging
Content Strand:
Connecting ideas
Standard:
Combine clauses in a wide variety of ways (e.g., creating compound and complex sentences, and compound-complex sentences) to make connections between and join ideas, for example, to show the relationship between multiple events or ideas (e.g., After eating lunch, the students worked in groups while their teacher walked around the room) or to evaluate an argument (e.g., The author claims X, although there is a lack of evidence to support this claim).
Combine clauses in a wide variety of ways (e.g., creating compound and complex sentences, and compound-complex sentences) to make connections between and join ideas, for example, to show the relationship between multiple events or ideas (e.g., After eating lunch, the students worked in groups while their teacher walked around the room) or to evaluate an argument (e.g., The author claims X, although there is a lack of evidence to support this claim).
Showing 91 - 100 of 132 Standards
Questions: Curriculum Frameworks and Instructional Resources Division |
CFIRD@cde.ca.gov | 916-319-0881